พูดคุย:Proof Hypercube 1 - ประวัติรุ่นแก้ไข

Jittat: Reverted edit of 140.128.20.205, changed back to last version by Jung

2007-10-28T08:39:58Z

Reverted edit of 140.128.20.205, changed back to last version by Jung

140.128.20.205 เมื่อ 23:04, 27 ตุลาคม 2550

2007-10-27T23:04:01Z

Jung เมื่อ 05:33, 10 เมษายน 2550

2007-04-10T05:33:54Z

Jung เมื่อ 05:15, 10 เมษายน 2550

2007-04-10T05:15:45Z

Jung: question...

2007-04-10T05:15:09Z

question...

หน้าใหม่

A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.

: Is the word '''contain''' ambiguous?? I can see all the points <math>x</math> satisfying <math>x_i < 0.5, \forall i</math> lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of <math>h_i</math> is ''completely'' contained in an other halfspace.

←รุ่นแก้ไขก่อนหน้า		รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 08:39, 28 ตุลาคม 2550
แถว 1:		แถว 1:
−	~~trdommonrela~~
	You say:		You say:

←รุ่นแก้ไขก่อนหน้า		รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 23:04, 27 ตุลาคม 2550
แถว 1:		แถว 1:
		+	trdommonrela
	You say:		You say:

←รุ่นแก้ไขก่อนหน้า		รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 05:33, 10 เมษายน 2550
แถว 3:		แถว 3:
	A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.		A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.

−	: Is the word '''contain''' ambiguous?? I can see all the points <math>x</math> satisfying <math>x_i < 0.5, \forall i</math> lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of <math>h_i</math> is ''completely'' contained in an other halfspace.	+	: Is the word '''contain''' ambiguous?? I can see all the points <math>x</math> satisfying <math>x_i < 0.5, \forall i</math> lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of a hyperplane <math>h_i</math> is ''completely'' contained in an other halfspace.

←รุ่นแก้ไขก่อนหน้า		รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 05:15, 10 เมษายน 2550
แถว 1:		แถว 1:
−	A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.	+	You say:
		+
		+	A more rigorous proof can also be achieved by considering other halfspaces and argue that it contains at least one of <math>h_i</math>.

	: Is the word '''contain''' ambiguous?? I can see all the points <math>x</math> satisfying <math>x_i < 0.5, \forall i</math> lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of <math>h_i</math> is ''completely'' contained in an other halfspace.		: Is the word '''contain''' ambiguous?? I can see all the points <math>x</math> satisfying <math>x_i < 0.5, \forall i</math> lie below any other halfspace. But I think none of <math>h_i</math> is ''completely'' contained in an other halfspace.